CO129-140 - Public Offices - 1869 — Page 336

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

It appears to his Lordship to be inconvenient that the question should be raised for the first time when the Court of Appeal, which might thereupon be called upon to reverse the decision of

a Magistrate for reasons

could not have been brought under his notice.

It is not, perhaps, easy to determine whether the political question should be left to the sole decision of the Executive, or whether it should be dealt with in the first instance by the Magistrate, subject to review by the Court of Appeal, and to the final determination of the Governor under the 10th section.

Lord Framville is inclined to prefer the latter course.

The practice, as pointed out by Thomas Henry in his evidence before the Extradition Committee, Question 492, seems to arise in cases of charges of murder; and it seems harsh to call upon a Magistrate merely on Appeal to decide that the offence charged amounts to "Murder" within the meaning of the Ordinance, when it may be notorious that the killing was political and not a murder in the legal sense of the word.

Lord Framville comes with the suggestion that the word "shall" should be substituted for "may".

With respect to the comments upon section 12, the addition of a few words "or until the acquittal of the fugitive from

Edit History

2026-05-20 09:00:45 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
It appears to his Lordship to be inconvenient that the question should be raised for the first time when the Court of Appeal, which might thereupon be called upon to reverse the decision of a Magistrate for reasons could not have been brought under his notice. It is not, perhaps, easy to determine whether the political question should be left to the sole decision of the Executive, or whether it should be dealt with in the first instance by the Magistrate, subject to review by the Court of Appeal, and to the final determination of the Governor under the 10th section. Lord Framville is inclined to prefer the latter course. The practice, as pointed out by Thomas Henry in his evidence before the Extradition Committee, Question 492, seems to arise in cases of charges of murder; and it seems harsh to call upon a Magistrate merely on Appeal to decide that the offence charged amounts to "Murder" within the meaning of the Ordinance, when it may be notorious that the killing was political and not a murder in the legal sense of the word. Lord Framville comes with the suggestion that the word "shall" should be substituted for "may". With respect to the comments upon section 12, the addition of a few words "or until the acquittal of the fugitive from
Baseline (Original)
It affan whis Lord lije inconvenient that the question thored to raised for the pist time when the Caret of Appeal, which might there, I called "fore to leverse the decision of a Mapitrate for reason akuuh could not have been brought- ander his notice. b It is not perhaps, Cary determine whether the political question should he left to the tole decision qtter Executive, or whether it showed le dealt with in the first instance I the Angistrate, subject & reviewal & the Maut & ∙Affect, and to the final deliermuistion & the fovernor under the 10% section. Lo before then chole at fremmille is incried to prefer ther Catter course." The prection > world, as ал Thwart pouited out Whis 334 Thomas Henny in his cuidence byfor the Extradition (remitter, Question 492, severall arise in Caser of chance of murder; and it Leems hars reasonable to call upon a Magistrate Manet 1 Appeal to decide that the t offence charged amounts "Murder" wether the Ardeiance, when it may I notorious that. tur the killing was political & not. a wurden in the legal the word. Leute Framville comes with the suggestion that the world) "shall", shaved 4 substated for "may Fr the word 'It shall I Cauful" With respect to the comments upon deel. 12, the addition of a few word" or until the acquittal of the fugitive from
2026-05-20 09:00:45 · Baseline
View content

It affan whis Lord lije inconvenient that the question thored to raised for the pist time when the Caret of Appeal, which might there, I called "fore to leverse the decision of

a Mapitrate for reason

akuuh

could not have been brought-

ander his notice.

b

It is not perhaps, Cary determine whether the political question should he left to the

tole decision qtter Executive, or whether it showed le dealt with in the first instance I the Angistrate, subject & reviewal & the Maut & ∙Affect, and to the final deliermuistion & the fovernor

under the 10% section.

Lo

before then chole at fremmille is incried to prefer ther

Catter course."

The prection

>

world, as

ал

Thwart

pouited out Whis

334

Thomas Henny in his cuidence

byfor the Extradition (remitter, Question 492, severall arise in

Caser

of chance of murder; and it

Leems hars

reasonable to call

upon a Magistrate Manet 1

Appeal to decide that the

t

offence charged amounts "Murder" wether the Ardeiance, when it

may

I notorious that.

tur

the killing was political & not.

a wurden in the legal the word.

Leute

Framville comes with the

suggestion that the world) "shall",

shaved 4 substated for

"may

Fr

the word 'It shall I Cauful"

With respect to the comments upon deel. 12, the addition of a few word" or until the

acquittal of the fugitive from

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.